The potential loss an institution may incur as a consequence of decisions that are principally based on the output of internal models
Over 1.8 million professionals use CFI to learn accounting, financial analysis, modeling and more. Start with a free account to explore 20+ always-free courses and hundreds of finance templates and cheat sheets.
Model risk is the potential loss an institution may incur as a consequence of decisions that are principally based on the output of internal models as a result of errors in the development, implementation, or use of models.
Model risk’s become prominent and of serious concern following the advent of the use of sophisticated quantitative models in dealing with applications in major disciplines. The risk arises mainly because of potential errors in the models and appropriate usage and implementation of the model. The errors and inaccuracies can cause considerable monetary losses, poor organizational decision-making, and damage to institutional reputation.
Model risk arises principally because of two reasons:
Since model risk is caused by the use of models, it’s appropriate to also define a model. A model is a quantitative system or mathematical representation that processes input data to derive quantitative estimates of different variables.
A model contains a set of variable assumptions and data for inputs, processes, outputs, and scenarios. It applies mathematical, statistical, financial, and economic data and techniques in a model. A model contains three major components:
1. Inputs: Data and assumptions of the model
2. Process: Processes that transform inputs into quantitative estimates
3. Reporting: Expression of estimates into valuable information for management
The following are some of the sources of model risk:
Data used in a model may be inaccurate, incomplete, or distorted. It is crucial in developing an effective model; hence, flawed data has the potential to compromise the whole model.
The incorrect and/or incomplete implementation of a model can lead to inaccurate or erroneous results that can have adverse effects on model results and the organizational decision-making process.
Statistical methodologies have their own errors, such as sampling errors and standard errors, that occur in regression modeling.
Unrealistic and incorrect assumptions may alter the intended parameters of a model, thereby inducing risk. When fitting model parameters, an error may result in the calibration of the model.
Inappropriate use of a model may invalidate an otherwise effective model.
Misinterpreting the results of a model brings on significant risk as a misinformed course of action is likely to be followed.
Incomplete and inaccurate model inventory leads to model risk.
A good model risk management (MRM) framework should be crafted based on industry best practices and conform to regulatory guidelines. An authority to benchmark the MRM framework is the Supervisory Guidance on Model Risk Management (SR 11-07) from the U.S. Federal Reserve.
The MRM framework should include the following processes in its life cycle:
Minimum standards should be set on the development of a model, and these standards need to be followed and respected. The internal standards should be at the same level or higher compared to regulatory standards such as Supervisory Guidance on Model Risk Management (SR 11-07).
The standards should encompass standards for data quality, model changes, model use, expert judgment, model methodology, model validation, documentation, external model data, and model reporting, among others.
After the establishment of a risk policy, it is prudent that a statement of the Board model risk appetite is well articulated for effective model risk management. Risk appetite is the amount of risk that an organization is prepared and capable of assuming in order to meet its desired objectives.
The level of risk appetite for model risk will depend on the purpose in which the model is applied. Model risk appetite should be stated in terms of risk tolerance and various relevant metrics such as aggregate quantitative risk exposure, the number of high risk-rated models, etc.
It is necessary to identify the specific risks that affect the organization. An inventory of existing models should be completed to identify key model changes. The model inventory should categorize features such as the following (among others):
A quantitative and qualitative risk assessment needs to be carried out to assess the model risk of each model. The two approaches will derive an enterprise-wide risk assessment framework.
The quantification of model risk uses various model risk measurement approaches, or they can use operational risk style model approaches. There are three main techniques to quantify risk notably:
A quantitative assessment will measure and collate each distinct quantifiable model risk assessment through the use of appropriate correlation factors.
Qualitative risk assessment involves consideration for the model fit for purpose. The result will indicate model robustness, which will have an impact on the model risk rating. A qualitative assessment considers the use of qualitative metrics to measure risk in a model – notably model compliance with standards, cumulative model errors, the degree of model risk assessment, and other qualitative factors.
Possible risk mitigation strategies may include the following:
The model risk monitoring and reporting function seeks to identify the following issues:
In summary, an MRM framework should encompass the following:
The overall risk management framework is as good as its implementation and the people who use it. Hence, an organization should cultivate a good risk culture within the organization.
CFI offers the Commercial Banking & Credit Analyst (CBCA)® certification program for those looking to take their careers to the next level. To keep learning and advancing your career, the following resources will be helpful:
Below is a break down of subject weightings in the FMVA® financial analyst program. As you can see there is a heavy focus on financial modeling, finance, Excel, business valuation, budgeting/forecasting, PowerPoint presentations, accounting and business strategy.
A well rounded financial analyst possesses all of the above skills!
CFI is the global institution behind the financial modeling and valuation analyst FMVA® Designation. CFI is on a mission to enable anyone to be a great financial analyst and have a great career path. In order to help you advance your career, CFI has compiled many resources to assist you along the path.
In order to become a great financial analyst, here are some more questions and answers for you to discover:
Access and download collection of free Templates to help power your productivity and performance.
Already have an account? Log in
Take your learning and productivity to the next level with our Premium Templates.
Upgrading to a paid membership gives you access to our extensive collection of plug-and-play Templates designed to power your performance—as well as CFI's full course catalog and accredited Certification Programs.
Already have a Self-Study or Full-Immersion membership? Log in
Gain unlimited access to more than 250 productivity Templates, CFI's full course catalog and accredited Certification Programs, hundreds of resources, expert reviews and support, the chance to work with real-world finance and research tools, and more.
Already have a Full-Immersion membership? Log in